|
Toronto, Canada, July 12-14, 1999:
Open-Space and Open-Hearts and Minds.
by Celeste Brody, co-president of IASCE
A small group of educators from around the world met at the Ryerson Institute
for the International Conference of the IASCE. This was to be a different
sort of meeting where participants would create the agenda for sessions
on the spot. Called an "open-space " technology conference, the ground
rules were simple: whoever comes are the right people; whatever happens
is the right thing to happen; whenever it begins it begins, when it's
over it's over; follow the law of two feet.
This format allowed participants to engage their most salient topics while
putting all participants on equal footing. In moving away from a traditional
paper or workshop format, we returned to the time when the organization
when conferences were small, ideas were engaged and wrestled with, research
agendas were formulated and human connections were encouraged. Mark Brubacher
and Mara Sapon-Shevin deftly orchestrated the organization of the open-space
format. When we were not in session talking about the issues we identified,
and enjoying Toronto, a city ablaze with the energy of summer and youth.
Topics were identified in the opening "brainstorming" session. Participants
signed up to attend a session at a particular time; a scribe took careful
notes on a laptop computer and the summaries of the conversations were
posted for all to see. Each participant received a summary of the sessions.
At the end of the conference, the IASCE Board met and discussed future
directions for the organization.
Topics of the Open Space Meeting:
- Societal Structures
that give Relevance to Cooperative Learning
Maureen Breeze, Great Britain
Maureen.breeze@co-ooperataive.com
- Collaborative Leadership
Carole Cooper, USA
carolecooper@voyager.net
- The Current Situation
and Future Role of the IASCE
Celeste Brody, USA
brody@lclark.edu
- How do you Institutionalize
High Quality Cooperative Learning?
Elizabeth Cohen, USA
egcohen@leland.stanford.edu
- Out of Class Academic
Collaboration among Students
George Jacobs, Singapore
gmjacobs@pacific.net.sg
- Teachers &
Ideology:Receptiveness to Take on Cooperative Learning Ideas. What are
the Barriers? Teacher Beliefs and Belief Systems
Maureen Breeze, Great Britain
Maureen.breeze@co-ooperataive.com
- Technology and
Cooperation
Larry Sherman, USA
- Comparing Local
Cooperative Learning Organizations
Sheila Silversides, Canada
- Group Problem Solving
and Evaluation Criteria
Elizabeth Cohen, USA
- Cooperative Learning
and Higher Education
Lynda Baloche, USA
lbaloche@wcupa.edu
- Humor and Cooperative
Learning
George Jacobs, Singapore
- ESL/EFL/LOTE and
Cooperative Learning
Sally Olsen, Japan
Callyo@bigfoot.com
The following is a summary of the key ideas from one of the sessions:
How do you institutionalize high quality cooperative learning? Are we
going to have pockets of excellence or can it be implemented with more
consistency and high quality? (Elizabeth Cohen facilitator)

Are there examples of excellence in institutionalizing high quality CL?
Japan and Canada have standard curriculum that has led to some consistent
mplementation. There are many examples demonstrating that after 4 years
of implementation, teachers carry out good practices independent of organizational
changes, but when there are changes in the administration, there are often
changes in priorities and these can affect teachers' ability to continue
CL practices.

|